Biardeau, LT, Davis, LW, Gertler, P. & Wolfram, C. Global heat exposure and cooling. Nat. To support. 3(1), 25-28 (2020).
IEA, The Future of Cooling, IEA, Paris (2018). https://www.iea.org/reports/the-future-of-cooling. (Accessed May 23, 2021)
Wang, Z. et al. Individual difference in thermal comfort: a review of the literature. To build. About. 138, 181-193 (2018).
Graham, L., Parkinson, T. & Schiavon, S. Where are we going now? Lessons from 20 years of CBE occupant surveys. To build. Cities 2(1), 166-184 (2021).
Derrible, S. & Reeder, M. The Cost of Excessively Cooling Commercial Buildings in the United States. Energy construction. 108, 304-306 (2015).
de Dear, RJ & Brager, GS Develop an adaptive model of thermal comfort and preference. ASHRAE Trans. 104, 145-167 (1998).
ASHRAE 55-2020 standard. Thermal environmental conditions for human occupation (American Society of Heating, Ventilation, Refrigeration, and Air Conditioning Engineers, 2020).
Mendell, MJ & Mirer, AG Indoor Thermal Factors and Symptoms in Office Workers: Results from the US EPA BASE Study. Indoor air 19, 291-302 (2009).
Chen, A. & Chang, VW-C. Human health and thermal comfort of office workers in Singapore. To build. About. 58, 172-178 (2012).
Sekhar, SC Thermal Comfort in Air-Conditioned Buildings in Hot, Humid Climates — Why Aren’t We Doing It Right ?. Indoor air 26, 138-152 (2016).
Elnaklah, R. et al. Thermal Comfort Standards in the Middle East: Current and Future Challenges. To build. About. 200, 107899 (2021).
Paliaga, G., Zhang, H., Hoyt, T. & Arens, E. Eliminate the discomfort of cooling while saving energy. ASHRAE J. 61, 14-28 (2019).
Cheung, T., Schiavon, S., Parkinson, T., Li, P. & Brager, G. PMV-PPD Model Accuracy Analysis Using the Global Thermal Comfort Database II ‘ASHRAE. To build. About. 153, 205-217 (2019).
Porras-Salazar, JA, Schiavon, S., Wargocki, P., Cheung, T. & Tham, KW Meta-analysis of 35 studies examining the effect of indoor temperature on office work performance. To build. About. 203, 108037 (2021).
Karjalainen, S. Thermal comfort and gender: a review of the literature. Indoor air 22, 96-109 (2012).
Kingma, B. & van Marken Lichtenbelt, W. Energy consumption in buildings and thermal demand of women. Nat. Clim. Switch 5, 1054-1056 (2015).
Kim, J., de Dear, R., Cândido, C., Zhang, H. & Arens, E. Gender differences in office occupants’ perceptions of indoor environmental quality (EQI). To build. About. 70, 245-256 (2013).
Choi, J., Aziz, A. & Loftness, V. Investigation of the impacts of different genders and ages on the satisfaction of thermal environments in office buildings. To build. About. 45, 1529-1535 (2010).
Park, J., Loftness, V. & Aziz, A. Post-occupancy assessment and IEQ measurements of 64 office buildings: critical factors and user satisfaction thresholds for thermal quality. Buildings 8, 156 (2018).
Holt, JL & DeVore, CJ Culture, Gender, Organizational Role, and Conflict Resolution Styles: A Meta-Analysis. Int. J. Interculte. Relative 29, 165–196 (2005).
Sintov, ND, White, LV & Walpole, H. War of thermostats? The roles of gender negotiations and thermal comfort in the behavior of household energy use. PLoS A 14, e0224198 (2019).
Fang, L., Wyon, DP, Clausen, G. & Fanger, PO Impact of indoor air temperature and humidity in an office on perceived air quality, SBS symptoms and performance. Indoor air 14(s7), 74-81 (2004).
Pew Research Center, Sizing Up Twitter Users, Pew Research Center, Washington, DC Accessed March 02, 2021. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/04/24/sizing-up-twitter-users/ (2019 ).
Schiavon, S. & Lee, KH Dynamic predictive clothing insulation models based on outdoor air and indoor operating temperatures. To build. About. 59, 250-260 (2013).
Khosla, R. et al. Cooling for sustainable development. Nat. To support. 4(3), 201-208 (2021).
Lipczynska, A., Schiavon, S. & Graham, LT Thermal comfort and self-reported productivity in an office with ceiling fans in the tropics. To build. About. 135, 202-212 (2018).
Kim, J. et al. Occupant Comfort and Behavior: High resolution data from a 6 month field study of personal comfort systems with 37 real office workers. To build. About. 148, 348-360 (2019).
Wickham, H. et al. Welcome to the tidyverse. J. Free software. 4(43), 1686 (2019).
Brunson, JC & Read, QD ggalluvial: Alluvial plots in ‘ggplot2’. Package R version 0.12.3 (2020).
Baylis, P. Temperature and Temperament: Evidence from Twitter. J. Econ. Public. 184, 104161 (2020).
Jung, J. & Uejio, CK Social media responses to heat waves. Int. J. Biometeorol. 61, 1247-1260 (2017).
Kearney, MW rtweet: Twitter Data Collection and Analysis. J. Free software. 4(42), 1829 (2019).
Schweiker, M. et al. Evaluating Scale Assumptions for the Subjective Assessment of Thermal Environments – Do Lay People Perceive Them the Way We Researchers Believe ?. Energy construction. 211, 109761 (2020).
Chamberlain, S. rnoaa: “NOAA” meteorological data from R. R package version 1.2.0. (2020).
Blevins, C. & Mullen, L. Jane, John … Leslie? A historical method for algorithmic gender prediction. Human. Liter. 9(3) (2015).
Silge, J. & Robinson, D. tidytext: Text exploration and analysis using ordered data principles in R. J. Free software. 1(3), 37 (2016).
Bouchet-Valat, M. (2020). SnowballC: Snowball Stemmers Based on the UTF-8 ‘libstemmer’ C library. Package R version 0.7.0 (2020).
Pedersen, TL ggraph: An implementation of graphics grammar for graphs and networks. Package R version 2.0.5. (2021).
Bamman, D., Eisenstein, J. & Schnoebelen, T. Gender identity and lexical variation in social media. J. Socialize. 18(2), 135-160 (2014).